The Memory Architecture
Walk into a hall in Jerusalem and look up. Six hundred faces look back at you from the ceiling, photographs of people murdered in the Holocaust, each one a recovered name. Around you, shelves of binders hold millions more.
Why this Chapter exists
Memory is built by choice.
The laws, museums, archives, memorials, and remembrance days that make it possible to teach the Holocaust had to be built, by governments, survivors, scholars, and philanthropists, across the decades after the war.
Each piece has a date and a decision behind it. The online Holocaust Encyclopedia of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum (USHMM) exists because Congress created the museum’s governing council in 1980 and the federal government provided land beside the National Mall. Private donors paid for the building, which opened in 1993. Yad Vashem’s online resources exist because Israel’s parliament, the Knesset, established Yad Vashem by law on August 19, 1953. International Holocaust Remembrance Day exists because the United Nations adopted Resolution 60/7 on November 1, 2005. None of these three existed in 1946.
A common misconception this Chapter addresses
This misreading concerns how long Holocaust education has been part of American schools.
- “Holocaust education has always been part of American public schools.” see the dedicated entry →
1944–1950
Recording it before the war even ended.
The work of recording the Holocaust began before the war ended:
- Oneg Shabbat. The secret archive of the Warsaw Ghetto, gathered by the historian Emanuel Ringelblum and some sixty collaborators, buried before the ghetto was destroyed, and told in full in the Resistance Chapter. The recovered archive, tens of thousands of pages, is held by the Jewish Historical Institute in Warsaw, which counts some 35,000 documents.
- The Soviet documentation. The Soviet Extraordinary Commission (established 1942) recorded the killings on Soviet soil, though it listed Jewish victims only as Soviet citizens. The Jewish Anti-Fascist Committee compiled The Black Book, edited by Vasily Grossman and Ilya Ehrenburg, suppressed by Stalin in 1948 and finally published in Jerusalem in 1980.
- The Central Jewish Historical Commission (Poland, established 1944 under Filip Friedman), which collected thousands of testimonies in 1944–47 and was later absorbed into the Jewish Historical Institute in Warsaw.
- The Wiener Holocaust Library (founded 1933 in Amsterdam by Alfred Wiener, moved to London in 1939), which describes itself as the oldest Holocaust archive, recording Nazi persecution from 1933 on.
- The YIVO Institute for Jewish Research, whose archive remains a core record of Eastern European Jewish life. Its center moved from Vilna to New York in 1940, and the Nazis looted its Vilna collections from 1941.
- The Allied documentation. After seeing Ohrdruf on April 12, 1945, General Dwight D. Eisenhower, the Allied commander in Europe, pressed for witnesses and cameras. Army photographers produced a vast photographic and film record of the liberated camps. The Nuremberg trials (1945–49) created the documentary record later used in scholarship and museums, covered in the Postwar Trials Chapter.
1951
Yom HaShoah, the first national day of remembrance.
Once a year, on a spring morning, a siren sounds across all of Israel for two minutes, and the country stops. Drivers pull over and step out of their cars on the highway. People stand still on the sidewalk. This is Yom HaShoah, the day Israel set aside to remember the Holocaust. The Knesset, Israel’s parliament, set it by resolution on April 12, 1951, and anchored it in law in 1959. Its full Hebrew name means “Holocaust and Heroism Remembrance Day.” The date, 27 Nisan in the Hebrew calendar, was chosen to mark the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising of April 1943, moved to a date after Passover. On the ordinary Western calendar it lands in April or May.
The siren sounds at 10:00 a.m. The main state ceremony is held at Yad Vashem, Israel’s national Holocaust memorial in Jerusalem, with observances in schools and army units across the country.
The 1951 resolution created the first state-level national day of Holocaust remembrance. Other national commemoration days followed, among them those in post-Communist Eastern Europe in the 1990s, and the UN’s International Holocaust Remembrance Day followed in 2005.
1953
Yad Vashem, Israel’s national memorial.
The name says what the place is for. Yad vashem is an ancient Hebrew phrase meaning “a memorial and a name.” It comes from Isaiah 56:5, which promises a name that “shall not be cut off.” Israel built an entire national institution around that promise: to give back a name to people the Nazis had tried to reduce to numbers. The Knesset created it by law on August 19, 1953, with a mandate to:
- Record the Holocaust period, roughly 1933 to 1945.
- Commemorate the some six million Jewish victims.
- Commemorate the Jewish resistance, rescue, and partisan efforts.
Yad Vashem
The Righteous Among the Nations.
During the Holocaust, helping a Jew could cost a rescuer their life. A small number of people did it anyway. They hid a family, forged papers, or smuggled children to safety. The Righteous Among the Nations program, mandated by the same 1953 law and set up in 1963, exists to find those people and honor them by name. Recognition is deliberately hard to earn: it takes real evidence, usually the testimony of the person who was saved, proof that the rescuer faced genuine danger, and proof that no payment changed hands.
Cases are reviewed by a commission traditionally chaired by an Israeli Supreme Court justice. Those approved receive the Medal of the Righteous, a certificate of honor, and an offer of honorary Israeli citizenship for surviving Righteous. At Yad Vashem, the Avenue and Garden of the Righteous carry trees and inscriptions with their names.
As of 2025, about 28,000 people from 51 countries have been recognized. The largest national groups are Poland (~7,200), the Netherlands (~5,900), France (~4,300), Ukraine (~2,700), Belgium (~1,800), Lithuania (~900), Hungary (~880), and Italy (~770), with roughly 100 to 200 new recognitions added each year.
Among the well-known cases:
- Raoul Wallenberg, the Swedish diplomat in Budapest whose protective passports saved tens of thousands of Hungarian Jews. Soviet forces arrested him in January 1945, and he disappeared in Soviet custody.
- Oskar Schindler, the German industrialist who protected about 1,200 Jewish workers (recognized 1993).
- Chiune Sugihara, the Japanese consul in Kaunas, Lithuania, who issued about 2,000 transit visas in 1940 that allowed roughly 6,000 Jews to escape.
- Aristides de Sousa Mendes, the Portuguese consul in Bordeaux who defied orders to issue visas in June 1940. About 3,900 recipients have been identified by name so far.
- Le Chambon-sur-Lignon, the French village that sheltered Jews under Pastor André Trocmé.
- The Danish rescue of October 1943, which evacuated about 7,000 Danish Jews to Sweden.
The recovery of names
The Hall of Names.
The Hall of Names at Yad Vashem is the effort to recover and preserve the name of every individual Jewish victim of the Holocaust. The project, begun under the 1953 law, has recorded about 4.9 million names. Some 2.8 million of them came through Pages of Testimony, one-page forms filled out by surviving relatives, friends, and community members with the basic facts of each victim’s life.
The Hall of Names itself was designed by Moshe Safdie for the 2005 museum expansion. Its ceiling is a cone holding photographs of about 600 victims, reflected in a pit of water below. The Pages of Testimony are stored on shelves around the space.
The work continues toward the goal of recovering all six million names. The remaining gap of about 1.1 million is mostly victims whose entire families were killed, leaving no relatives to file a Page, and victims from the Eastern European regions where the records themselves were destroyed.
The 1970s–1980s
The post-Eichmann broadening.
In the 1950s, survivors remembered mostly within their own communities. Historians debate how much wider attention there was. The historian Hasia Diner, in We Remember with Reverence and Love (2009), argues that American Jews commemorated the catastrophe widely between 1945 and 1962. Public attention grew sharply in 1961, when Adolf Eichmann, a chief organizer of the deportations, was put on trial in Jerusalem (the trial at the center of the Hannah Arendt and Postwar Trials Chapters). More than 100 witnesses testified, most of them survivors, and the trial became one of the first widely televised. Much of the memorial framework built through the 1960s and 1970s developed after that shift:
- American Holocaust scholarship. Raul Hilberg’s The Destruction of the European Jews (1961), Hannah Arendt’s Eichmann in Jerusalem (1963), and Lucy Dawidowicz’s The War Against the Jews (1975) built the scholarly foundation, and Holocaust studies spread across American universities.
- The Six-Day War of June 1967, in which Israel defeated the surrounding Arab states, heightened American Jewish engagement with Jewish history and with the Holocaust as a frame for Jewish identity, as historians such as Peter Novick have argued.
- The 1978 NBC miniseries Holocaust, watched by about 120 million Americans over four nights that April, brought the subject to a mass audience. It helped prompt the President’s Commission on the Holocaust, announced by Jimmy Carter on May 1, 1978 and created by executive order that November.
- Holocaust Museum LA (founded 1961), one of the first Holocaust museums in the United States.
1980–1993
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum.
USHMM was the federal response to the American engagement of the late 1970s, built over roughly fifteen years:
- May 1, 1978. President Carter announced the President’s Commission on the Holocaust, created by executive order that November with the Auschwitz survivor and author Elie Wiesel as chairman, to recommend a national memorial.
- September 27, 1979. The Commission recommended a national museum and education center in Washington, D.C., plus a national Days of Remembrance program.
- October 7, 1980. Public Law 96-388 became law, creating the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Council to design, fund, and build the museum, with Wiesel as chairman through 1986.
- October 5, 1988. The cornerstone-laying at 100 Raoul Wallenberg Place SW, beside the National Mall.
- April 22, 1993. The dedication, with President Bill Clinton, Israeli President Chaim Herzog, and about 10,000 attendees, including the lighting of the eternal flame in the Hall of Remembrance.
The building was designed by James Ingo Freed of Pei Cobb Freed & Partners. It draws on the industrial vocabulary of the camps: exposed brick, steel beams, narrow corridors. It stands among the national monuments beside the National Mall and the Washington Monument.
The museum has received some 50 million visitors since 1993, and its online Holocaust Encyclopedia was visited by more than 26.5 million people in 2024. Its research arm, the Mandel Center for Advanced Holocaust Studies, has produced extensive scholarship, and its outreach includes teacher fellowships and the Bringing the Lessons Home community program.
Recording the witnesses
The architecture of testimony.
The recording of survivor testimony is the documentary foundation much of the memorial framework rests on. The major projects:
- The Fortunoff Video Archive at Yale, opened in 1981 by Geoffrey Hartman and Dori Laub from a project begun in 1979, the first systematic video testimony archive, with about 4,400 testimonies.
- The USC Shoah Foundation Visual History Archive, founded by Steven Spielberg in 1994 after Schindler’s List. It holds more than 55,000 video testimonies in 43 languages from 65 countries, gathered in 1994–99 with some 2,300 interviewers. It is housed at the University of Southern California, with access through about 250 institutions worldwide.
- Yad Vashem’s testimony collection, about 130,000 testimonies in video, audio, and writing, much of it in partnership with the Shoah Foundation.
- USHMM’s Oral History Archive, about 19,000 testimonies.
- Centropa, a multimedia archive of twentieth-century Central, Eastern, and Soviet European Jewish life, about 1,200 biographical narratives built from family photographs and recorded audio. Covered on the Films & Video page.
As the survivor generation ages, their families have organized to carry the testimony forward. Living Links, founded in 2023, trains survivors’ grandchildren, the generation called 3G, to bring their families’ stories into classrooms. Its partner, the USC Shoah Foundation, describes it as the first national organization of survivors’ grandchildren.
1946–today
The confession that became a memorial.
Among the most quoted texts of Holocaust memory is a confession by the German pastor Martin Niemöller (1892–1984), and it began as a spoken admission of failure. Niemöller was no early opponent of the regime. A decorated U-boat officer of the First World War and a fervent nationalist, he took part in right-wing and antisemitic organizations in the 1920s, according to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. He voted for the Nazi Party in March 1933 and sympathized with many of its ideas. The regime’s interference in the churches turned him. He helped found the Pastors’ Emergency League in 1933 and was arrested by the Gestapo on July 1, 1937. After a 1938 conviction he was kept in custody beyond his sentence: Sachsenhausen from 1938 to 1941, then Dachau. In the war’s final days the SS moved him south with other political prisoners, and American troops liberated him in South Tyrol, in northern Italy.
On a lecture tour of occupied western Germany in 1946, Niemöller began confessing in public what he had failed to do. His formula named the regime’s victims group by group: first they came for one group, and I did not speak out, because I was not one of them. Then the next group, and the next. The formula ends where his silence had left him, with no one remaining to speak for him. Because he spoke it aloud and varied the list of victims from lecture to lecture, no single canonical text exists, a fact the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum documents alongside the versions. The words spread into classrooms, anthologies, and memorial services far beyond Germany, and are often taught as a poem.
1995–today
The Stolpersteine, stones in the pavement.
The German artist Gunter Demnig (born 1947) conceived the Stolpersteine (“stumbling stones”) in 1992–93 and laid the first 25 of them in Cologne on January 4, 1995. Each is a brass cobblestone, about 10 by 10 centimeters, set into the sidewalk in front of the last home that a victim of Nazi persecution chose freely. It carries the person’s name, date of birth, fate, and, where known, date and place of death.
By the project’s own count, 116,000 Stolpersteine have now been laid in more than 1,860 towns and cities in 31 European countries, most of them in Germany. The project describes itself as the world’s largest decentralized memorial.
The aim is to return the individual victim to the everyday space they were taken from. Each stone requires research, usually by local volunteers, school groups, and the victims’ families, to verify the name, the home, and the fate. The cost of each (about €120 in the 2020s) is borne by sponsors such as families, school classes, and community groups.
The project has raised questions. The Munich city council voted against permitting Stolpersteine in 2004 and again in 2015, on an argument advanced by the Jewish Community of Munich and Upper Bavaria that placing the names where pedestrians walk over them disrespects the victims. Many European Jewish communities have supported the project, and the Munich position remains the best-known counter-view.
2005
The Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe.
The Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe was dedicated on May 10, 2005, in central Berlin, about a block south of the Brandenburg Gate. It covers some 19,000 square meters (about 4.7 acres) and consists of 2,711 concrete stelae of varying heights, from about 0.2 to 4.7 meters, arranged on a gently sloping field. The architect was Peter Eisenman.
It took a long time to build. Journalist Lea Rosh first proposed a Berlin Holocaust memorial in 1988. The process ran some seventeen years, through two architectural competitions, extended debate in the Bundestag, Germany’s parliament (a 1999 vote of 314–209 approved the Eisenman design), and long negotiation. The total cost was about €27 million.
It is Germany’s official national memorial to the Jewish victims, placed at the symbolic heart of the country, near the Reichstag, the Brandenburg Gate, and the former site of Hitler’s Chancellery and bunker. The underground Information Center, designed by Dagmar von Wilcken, tells individual victims’ stories, complementing the abstract field of stelae above with specific records below.
2005
International Holocaust Remembrance Day.
One day is set aside for the whole world to remember the Holocaust together: January 27. On that date in 1945, Soviet troops reached the Auschwitz-Birkenau camp complex, the largest Nazi killing center. The United Nations made the day official in 2005, when its General Assembly adopted Resolution 60/7 by consensus, without a vote. Israel, the United States, and the states of the European Union were among its sponsors. The resolution:
- Designated January 27 as International Holocaust Remembrance Day.
- Urged member states to develop educational programs to preserve the memory of the Holocaust and help prevent genocide.
- Rejected any denial of the Holocaust as a historical event.
- Commended states that have preserved Holocaust sites for education.
The UN observance includes an annual ceremony at headquarters in New York and an academic conference, alongside national observances worldwide. The Israeli Yom HaShoah falls on the Hebrew calendar and the UN day on the Gregorian calendar, so many communities mark both.
1998–today
The IHRA framework.
Governments cooperate on Holocaust education, remembrance, and research through the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, or IHRA. Founded in 1998, it now links about 35 member states (among them the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, Israel, France, and Italy) and adopts non-binding working definitions and recommendations for them.
The IHRA Working Definition of Antisemitism, adopted on May 26, 2016, is the reference point covered in the Contemporary Antisemitism Chapter. It has been adopted or endorsed by dozens of national governments, the European Parliament, the U.S. State Department, and many universities, municipalities, and organizations. It is also contested. The 2021 Jerusalem Declaration on Antisemitism, written by scholars of antisemitism and related fields, offers a rival definition, and the Contemporary Antisemitism Chapter sets the two side by side.
The teaching laws
U.S. education mandates.
A July 2026 review by the U.S. Government Accountability Office found that 42 states and the District of Columbia require Holocaust education through academic standards or state law. In 25 of them the requirement is written into law, and the rest set it in their academic standards. The requirements vary widely in scope.
- New York, Education Law §801. Enacted 1994 and expanded since. It requires the State Board of Regents to provide curriculum materials on the Holocaust and other genocides, and requires districts to provide the instruction.
- New Jersey, N.J.S.A. 18A:35-28 (1994), among the earliest and broadest state Holocaust education mandates, covering elementary and secondary levels. Illinois had enacted the first in 1990.
- California, Education Code §51220, which requires social sciences in grades 7–12 to give “particular attention to the study of the inhumanity of genocide, slavery, and the Holocaust.”
- Florida and Texas, each with their own statutes requiring Holocaust instruction or remembrance.
- Every state’s requirement, law by law, is on the State Mandates page.
At the federal level, the Never Again Education Act, signed into law on May 29, 2020 (Public Law 116-141), authorizes USHMM to develop and distribute Holocaust education resources and to provide teacher professional development nationwide. It authorized $2 million a year, and in December 2024 Congress extended the authorization through fiscal year 2030.
Most of these laws require that the Holocaust be taught. Few say what to teach, in which grade, or to what depth. Those decisions (the lessons, the materials, the number of class days) are left to local districts. Supplemental materials exist from the USHMM, state agencies, and outside organizations, and districts choose among them.
Today
The global museum network.
An international network of Holocaust museums, memorials, archives, and documentation centers now spans dozens of countries, most of it built since the 1980s. Beyond Yad Vashem and the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, the major ones include:
- Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum (Oświęcim, Poland), created by an act of the Polish parliament on July 2, 1947, on the grounds of Auschwitz I and Auschwitz II-Birkenau. A group of former prisoners had been sent to the site in 1946 to protect it. The camp itself is told in Unit 4 · Ch. 04 · The Camp System.
- POLIN Museum of the History of Polish Jews (Warsaw), whose core exhibition opened October 28, 2014, on the site of the prewar Jewish quarter that became the Warsaw Ghetto. Its mandate is the thousand-year history of Polish Jewish life, the civilizational context, not only the Holocaust.
- Jewish Museum Berlin, opened September 9, 2001, designed by Daniel Libeskind, known for its zigzagging form and architectural voids.
- Museum of Jewish Heritage (New York), opened 1997, covered on the Field Trips page.
- Mémorial de la Shoah (Paris), founded in 1956 and reopened in its current form in 2005, whose Wall of Names lists the 76,000 Jews deported from France during the Holocaust.
- Anne Frank House (Amsterdam), opened May 3, 1960 in the building where Anne Frank and her family hid from 1942 to 1944, with about 1.2 million visitors a year before the pandemic.
- Others include the Imperial War Museum Holocaust Exhibition (London, 2000), the Sydney Jewish Museum (1992), Holocaust Centre Norway (Oslo), the Holocaust Memorial Center (Budapest, 2004), and the Galicia Jewish Museum (Kraków, 2004).
Open debates
What historians still debate.
The scholarship on the memory framework carries several open debates:
- “Americanization.” Peter Novick’s The Holocaust in American Life (1999) argued that late-twentieth-century American engagement with the Holocaust was shaped as much by American Jewish politics after 1967 as by the events themselves. Later scholarship has refined rather than simply adopted or rejected his thesis.
- “Uniqueness.” Whether the Holocaust should be understood as a singular event or as the central example within a broader history of genocide has been debated extensively. Memorial institutions have balanced the Jewish-specific dimension and the broader humanitarian frame in different ways. Yehuda Bauer (Rethinking the Holocaust, 2001) calls the Holocaust unprecedented, and Steven Katz argues that it was unique. Other scholars place it within a comparative history of genocide.
- “Memorial politics.” Whether the memorial framework has served its educational purpose, or has been turned to present-day political ends, has been argued through the Berlin Memorial debates, the Polish debates over wartime conduct, and other cases. The scholarship records both the educational achievements and the political tensions.
- “Compassion fatigue.” Whether the steady expansion of memorials has produced diminishing engagement has been raised. Visitor numbers remain high, among them USHMM’s roughly 50 million since 1993, but attendance alone does not settle the question, and it continues to be debated.
The Hall of Names in Jerusalem holds about 4.9 million names. Its shelves keep space for the more than one million names not yet recovered.
Key takeaways
- Laws, museums, archives, remembrance days, and name databases for Holocaust memory were built deliberately across more than sixty years.
- The work began during the war, with the buried Oneg Shabbat archive of the Warsaw Ghetto.
- Israel built the first national framework: Yom HaShoah in 1951 and Yad Vashem in 1953, whose Hall of Names has recovered about 4.9 million names.
- The Eichmann trial of 1961 moved survivor testimony to the center of public memory. The great testimony archives followed, beginning with Yale’s Fortunoff Archive in 1981.
- The United States built USHMM between 1978 and 1993. In Germany, the Stolpersteine project set stones into the sidewalks, and the Bundestag approved the Berlin Memorial at the center of the capital.
- January 27, the liberation of Auschwitz, became International Holocaust Remembrance Day by UN resolution in 2005.
- Most U.S. states now require Holocaust education, and almost half require it by law. New York’s Education Law §801 has required it since 1994.
Object Spotlight
A Page of Testimony.
A Page of Testimony is a single sheet of paper, a one-page form filled out by someone who knew a victim: a surviving relative, a friend, a neighbor. It records the basic facts of that person’s life (name, birthplace, parents, profession, wartime address, and the place and circumstances of death), and the person filling it out signs it.
Yad Vashem has collected about 2.8 million of them since the 1950s. They fill the shelves that ring the Hall of Names, with space left open for the pages still to come. Most of the murdered have no grave. Yad Vashem calls the Pages symbolic tombstones, and for millions of people that sheet of paper is the only marker there is.
Anyone can read them. The Pages are digitized in the Central Database of Shoah Victims’ Names, where the roughly 4.9 million names recovered so far can be searched one person at a time.
Discussion questions
Working from the evidence.
Each question is anchored in a fact this Chapter documents. Answer from the evidence on the page.
- Every institution in this Chapter was argued for, funded, and designed by particular people making choices. Choose one, a museum, a remembrance day, a database, and explain what choices its builders made about how the Holocaust would be remembered.
- The Hall of Names gathers Pages of Testimony for individual victims. Berlin’s memorial is 2,711 unmarked concrete slabs. These are opposite choices, names versus abstraction. What does each accomplish that the other cannot?
- The Stolpersteine set memory into the pavement outside a victim’s last home instead of inside a museum. What happens to a person who trips over a name in the street that cannot happen behind glass?
- In the 1950s survivors remembered mostly within their own communities, and historians debate how much wider attention there was. Hasia Diner argues that American Jews commemorated the catastrophe widely between 1945 and 1962. What kind of evidence would settle the debate?
- Israel set its remembrance day in 1951 and created Yad Vashem in 1953. The U.S. museum opened in 1993, and the United Nations made its day official in 2005. What does that order suggest about whose responsibility the memory became?
Classroom Connections
Where this Chapter fits.
Teaching Connections
- World History. The memorial framework, laws, museums, archives, remembrance days, and international institutions, including the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum and the 2020 Never Again Education Act, is part of postwar history.
- Classroom Applications. Students can:
- evaluate museums and memorials as historical sources, not only as commemoration
- analyze museum interpretation and memorial design
- distinguish remembrance, documentation, and education as different functions
- trace how an institution preserves and organizes primary evidence
- compare national and international memory frameworks
- construct evidence-based arguments using primary and secondary sources.
- International Classroom Relevance. Because this Chapter examines museums, archives, memorials, remembrance days, and international remembrance institutions, it supports Holocaust education, museum and memory studies, civic education, human-rights education, and source-based historical inquiry.
Standards Alignment
- NYS Social Studies Framework: NY Grade 8 (United States History) 8.6 and NY Global History 10.10 (Human Rights Violations).
- NYS Holocaust Education Mandate, Education Law §801. The Chapter sets out the institutions and laws the required instruction draws on.
- Common Core, Reading in History/Social Studies (grades 6–12). Students assess purpose and point of view (RH.6–8.6, RH.9–10.6, RH.11–12.6). They corroborate evidence across sources (RH.6–8.9, RH.9–10.9, RH.11–12.9), working from the 1953 Yad Vashem Law, the 1980 USHMM Council Act, UN Resolution 60/7, the IHRA Working Definition, and the Never Again Education Act.
- C3 Framework, D2.His.1 & D2.His.14 (grades 6–8 and 9–12). Students investigate chronology, continuity and change, and evidence-based interpretation while examining how a society builds the institutions that preserve and teach its history.
For further classroom use
- For teachers. The USHMM teacher fellowships, the Yad Vashem International School for Holocaust Studies, the Echoes & Reflections curriculum (ADL, USC Shoah Foundation, and Yad Vashem), and Facing History and Ourselves offer free professional development.
Sources and citations
Primary sources
A primary source is a record from the time. It was made by people who were there. Examples: letters, diaries, photos, decrees, trial records, and newspapers.
- Wiesel, Elie. From the Kingdom of Memory. New York: Summit Books, 1990.
- The Yad Vashem Martyrs’ and Heroes’ Remembrance Law (5713-1953). Israel Knesset, August 19, 1953.
- The United States Holocaust Memorial Council Act (Public Law 96-388, October 7, 1980).
- United Nations General Assembly Resolution 60/7 (November 1, 2005).
- The Never Again Education Act (Public Law 116-141, May 29, 2020).
- The IHRA Working Definition of Antisemitism (May 26, 2016).
- Isaiah 56:5 (“a memorial and a name,” yad vashem). Sefaria. sefaria.org.
- Jerusalem Declaration on Antisemitism. Launched March 25, 2021. jerusalemdeclaration.org.
- The Never Again Education Reauthorization Act of 2023 (Public Law 118-197, December 23, 2024).
Secondary sources
A secondary source was written later. It is a book or article by a historian who studied those records and explains what they mean.
- USC Shoah Foundation. “USC Shoah Foundation Partners with Living Links, First National Organization for Grandchildren of Holocaust Survivors.” May 2024. sfi.usc.edu.
- United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. “Martin Niemöller: ‘First they came for the Socialists...’” Holocaust Encyclopedia. encyclopedia.ushmm.org.
- Young, James E. The Texture of Memory: Holocaust Memorials and Meaning. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993.
- Young, James E. At Memory’s Edge: After-Images of the Holocaust in Contemporary Art and Architecture. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2000.
- Novick, Peter. The Holocaust in American Life. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1999.
- Jewish Historical Institute (Żydowski Instytut Historyczny), Warsaw. “About the Ringelblum Archive.” (The Institute’s count of some 35,000 documents; the 1946 and 1950 recoveries.) jhi.pl.
- UNESCO Memory of the World. “Warsaw Ghetto Archives (Emanuel Ringelblum Archives).” Inscribed 1999. (1,680 archival units, approximately 25,000 pages.) unesco.org.
- Cole, Tim. Selling the Holocaust: From Auschwitz to Schindler. New York: Routledge, 1999.
- Linenthal, Edward T. Preserving Memory: The Struggle to Create America’s Holocaust Museum. New York: Viking, 1995.
- Zertal, Idith. Israel’s Holocaust and the Politics of Nationhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
- Bauer, Yehuda. Rethinking the Holocaust. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2001.
- Katz, Steven T. The Holocaust in Historical Context. Vol. 1, The Holocaust and Mass Death before the Modern Age. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.
- Stier, Oren Baruch. Holocaust Icons: Symbolizing the Shoah in History and Memory. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2015.
- Hansen-Glucklich, Jennifer. Holocaust Memory Reframed: Museums and the Challenges of Representation. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2014.
- Apel, Dora. Memory Effects: The Holocaust and the Art of Secondary Witnessing. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2002.
- Diner, Hasia R. We Remember with Reverence and Love: American Jews and the Myth of Silence after the Holocaust, 1945–1962. New York: New York University Press, 2009.
- Yad Vashem · yadvashem.org →
- United States Holocaust Memorial Museum · ushmm.org →
- United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. “History of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum.” Holocaust Encyclopedia. encyclopedia.ushmm.org →
- USC Shoah Foundation Visual History Archive · sfi.usc.edu →
- The Stolpersteine project · stolpersteine.eu →
- Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe · stiftung-denkmal.de →
- International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance · holocaustremembrance.com →
- POLIN Museum of the History of Polish Jews · polin.pl/en →
- Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum. “History of the Memorial.” The former prisoners sent to protect the site in 1946 and the act of July 2, 1947. auschwitz.org →
- Echoes & Reflections, State by State: Holocaust Education Legislation · echoesandreflections.org →
- U.S. Government Accountability Office. “K–12 Education: How States and the U.S. Holocaust Museum Support Holocaust Education.” GAO-26-108023, July 2026. gao.gov/products/gao-26-108023.
Finding these documents: many primary sources are free online. Good places to start are the Fordham Internet Jewish History Sourcebook, Yale’s Avalon Project (law and diplomacy), German History in Documents, the collections of the US Holocaust Memorial Museum and Yad Vashem, the National Library of Israel, and Sefaria (for Jewish texts). Search the document’s name and date.
Nostra Aetate (1965): the Second Vatican Council declaration in which the Catholic Church repudiated the deicide charge and the teaching of contempt, reversing teachings that had run through Catholic preaching and instruction for most of two thousand years.
Comments?
Write to editor@teachjewishhistory.org.
Last updated: November 2026.

